Stuff I Do

Experiences and Encounters in Pune

Archive for August, 2009

Sparrows by Anusha

Posted by Sanskriti on August 17, 2009

For a change, a short article by Anusha …

Till I was about 10 years old, I used to live in Aundhgaon, quite close to the Mula river. I used to watch the birds all the time. How birds, especially sparrows go about their business is so interesting.

The Avian Ritz

One day I had this bright idea of putting a bird feeder

in the balcony with some bajra and water. For the first few days no birds came visiting. But just as I decided that I would take the feeder off, one sparrow came to the feeder and started pecking away at the bajra seeds. Then another one came…and another, and another, and another. I was so happy. Now I had to change the water and refill the bajra bowl everyday, sometimes twice a day. It was like running a restaurant!

Other birds came too, not just sparrows. Mynas, blue rock pigeons and sunbirds. The sunbirds used to come have a drink of water, and maybe a sip or two from the flowers Amma had planted in the balcony.

Watching the birds was also a great source of entertainment. They did loads of silly things. There was a small pipe jutting out of the wall of the neighboring house. One day I saw a sparrow hovering around it, probably looking for a place to build a nest. And then, the sparrow’s head got stuck in the pipe! It must’ve gotten completely gassed out by the smell in the pipe. Another sparrow was fluttering around nearby and it saw the other sparrow stuck in pipe. It started jumping on the pipe trying to get the other sparrow un-stuck. After a few minutes of jumping and pulling, the stuck-up sparrow was free.

One day my parents told me that we were shifting to a new house also in Aundh, but further from the Mula. It also meant that I had to leave my birdy-friends! I didn’t want to, but I had to. It must have been really hard for the birds to come to the bird feeder and then find no bajra and no water. I was feeling really sad and guilty for that. One of the first things I did in the new house was to look for the birds there. There weren’t many sparrows, but there were many sunbirds, ashy wren warblers, grey hornbills, fantailed flycatchers, magpie robins, red vented bulbuls and grey tits.

The birds in the new house are those found in gardens. There were more sparrows in the old house probably because there was a provision store nearby which had huge sacks of grain. Grain was usually scattered all over the place near the store, so obviously there were many sparrows hanging around. Here in the new house there are many more green trees and bushes so there are these garden-type birds. A nice and interesting contrast of birds.

Unfortunately there isn’t much place for a bird feeder, though I can still observe them. Often bulbuls nest on top of a tube light in the parking lot. I wonder how they go to sleep with the tube light on shining brightly…but they usually still manage to raise a brood properly.

The birds here are different and interesting, but I still miss the sparrows of the old house.

Advertisements

Posted in Places in Pune, Uncategorized | 10 Comments »

Places I Like

Posted by Sanskriti on August 14, 2009

Peeyush emailed about the Places I Like exhibit at Goethe Institut, Bangalore, described thus:

The reasons why we live in a particular city or a particular area in a city, or why we frequent certain places are not necessarily the same as those used by a city to attract tourists or enhance its image. Every city has places which are of no great interest to tourists, buildings that are not memorials, residential areas that are not very prestigious, but where people feel at home notwithstanding. Places that play a role in collective memory, or places linked to individual lives, places with special spatial or social qualities.

Would be lovely to have this exhibit travel to Pune. 

Sujit feels it could be a powerful way to talk about ‘the city as something that people create’. A workhop (such as the one briefly described at the Goethe Institut, Bangalore site) could provide the forum to discuss how aspects such as heritage and sense of place figure in the currently ongoing process of the Development Plan of Pune — which places do we hold dear, especially in the old city, which must find pride of place in the DP, instead of being destroyed in the quest for densification/ amalgamation/ modernization.

…..

Which are some of my favourite places?

Ram Nadi upstream of Bavdhan, Pune

Ram Nadi upstream of Bavdhan, Pune

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banyan Avenue, University of Pune: Arvind Gupta led a Tree Walk here, some years ago

Banyan Avenue, University of Pune: Arvind Gupta led a Tree Walk here, some years ago

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A tap at a farm between Pashan and Baner beside the Ram Nadi. The banyan trees along the road next to Police Ground. The banyan tree on the Sus Road side of Pashan Lake. Patio at Aundh.  And many more.

Posted in Places in Pune | 12 Comments »

The ‘Bottle Bottle’ Man Will Help!

Posted by Sanskriti on August 11, 2009

Sourabh (or Soar Hub as his email id says) will help create a sorting shed for dry waste out of waste materials. Soar Hub is the Bottle Bottle man – an architect and a teacher at Aman Setu school, experimenting with various alternative materials and methods for creating a variety of spaces. See this video for examples of bottle-bottle architecture (and search for antiismistix on YouTube for more of where that came from).

Today we met to work out how the SWACH waste collector ladies would use the space, what we would construct the shed out of and how we will use the swine flu break to get students to volunteer. This last idea seems to have fallen flat on its face, but we are proceeding with collecting waste materials.

We plan to collect one litre soft drink bottles, torn cement bags, old tyres as the main materials. Some embellishment will be done with coloured glass.

The specifications for the design are:

  • About 12 sq meters of work space
  • Ventilation and shade
  • Non inflammable construction materials (the PET bottles will be filled with mud, just in case a question arose in your mind) – coz certain frustrated beings have been known to set fire to compost pits (which burned coz they were made of fibre glass)
  • A shelf or half mala to store packaged material
  • One wall should be a half-wall so that people can see the activity that takes place inside
  • All (or most) material used should be ‘waste materials’

So, hopefully we will gather the construction materials over the next few days, and build the sorting shed very soon. Watch this space!

Posted in Waste Management | 10 Comments »

Strengthen Reporting Framework of Pune’s Environment Status Report

Posted by Sanskriti on August 10, 2009

What is the ESR?
The Environment Status Report (ESR) for 2008-09 of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) was recently tabled before the General Body (see Sakal Times Pune’s Environment Report is Scary )

The PMC is required to produce its ESR annually, under the BPMC Act. The purpose is to indicate the status of environment management in the city and identify the areas where mitigation measures are required to be considered. Pune has been publishing annual ESRs for over a decade.

However, a recent MPCB study analyzing the ESR produced by cities in Maharashtra states that ‘As a result of weak analytical framework and inconsistent data, the effort has remained only till compiling information on various environmental issues with ESRs having little role to play in action planning’.

It further suggests that ‘ESR data can be used to assess the environmental performance of the cities. ESR also can play a key role in mainstreaming environmental considerations in development policies. Since it is a document produced by the ULBs, it can trigger action at the city level. ESR it is a document which is published for citizens. If outreach of ESR is increased; then it will increase the awareness among citizens about the environmental issues and encourage public participation.’

Pune’s ESR is probably the best amongst the ones produced in Maharashtra. It is a single point source for information on sectors such as where does Pune’s water come from, how much sewage and waste is generated, the situation of traffic and transportation etc. However, its usefulness as a planning and budgeting tool is certainly limited. The main issue being that it reports the data that is provided by the departments, not necessarily that which is needed to measure progress. Citizens also know that many of the figures bandied about are estimates rather than actual measurements (such as there isn’t a weighing scale at the land fill so how do we know what quantity of kachra reaches the landfill, or how do we know the quantity of ground water abstracted since no one even knows the number of bore wells in the city).

Effort by the PCEF
The Pune Citizens Environment Forum (PCEF) was set up in 2007 with the Municipal Commissioner as Chairperson. One of the tasks it took up was strengthening the reporting framework for the Pune ESR. Over the last few months, a core team from the PCEF worked closely with the PMC Environment Cell to incorporate indicators drawn and adapted from various sources.

We first considered the framework developed by UNEP and GRID Arendal as the City Environment Reports on the Internet (CEROI), a few years ago.

Apart from CEROI, two important recent initiatives which have a bearing on reporting by urban local bodies:

  1. Standard Service Level Benchmarks (SSLB, and link opens a 2.2 mb pdf in a new window) created as part of the JNNURM: The SSLBs have been created to introduce an appropriate system for information management, performance monitoring, and benchmarking, by a Core Group on Benchmarking under the Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), Government of India. A framework has been prepared for water supply, wastewater management, storm water drainage, solid waste management services and urban transport. Public disclosure of performance using the standardized service level benchmarks is likely to be mandatory in the near future under the JNNURM.
  2. Guidelines prepared by the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) in June 2009 after its ‘Evaluation of Environmental Status Reports of Cities in Maharashtra’. This document provides a Driving Forces- Pressures-State of Environment-Impacts-Response (DPSIR) framework that could be used for preparing ESRs. The MPCB guidelines are likely to become the standard reference for preparation of ESRs in Maharashtra.

Efforts to improve the Pune ESR reporting framework will need to take these two documents into account. These are generic guidelines and some thought should be put into adapting them for use in Pune. Such adaptation may pertain to the content/ indicators as well as to the phases in which the current data collection and reporting systems will change over time to become more coherent and usable against the overall mandate of the ESR framework which pertains to environmental quality and health of citizens.

Suggestions for Further Work on Pune ESR Framework

A concerted effort to improve the reporting framework was put in jointly by the Environment Cell, the Ultra Tech team (contracted by the Environment Cell for production of the ESR 2008-09) and the PCEF core team. The following seem to be important areas of future work to get to the next level of improvement:

  • Assessment of the reporting framework of Pune ESR 2008-09, especially against the SSLB framework and MPCB Guidelines, as well as identifying areas for adaptation of these frameworks for use in Pune
  • Identifying / mapping actual data collection systems of various departments
  • Creating a year-round mechanism of data collection and analysis, especially data to be disaggregated at the ward-level (as Prof Aneeta Benninger has suggested for years)
  • Providing a mechanism for non-PMC entities (citizens, colleges, NGOs, researchers) to share their information/ data and also to identify research/ study needs, promote citizen analysis of the ESR, and to commission future research

Ideas are needed for creative sharing of the content of the ESR and its analysis.  Discussion sessions at every ward office? Sector-specific seminars by NGOs? Seminars in the universities idenitfying needs for studies and research? What about areas not currently included in the ESR  – such as needs of the informal sector, employment data, status of biodiversity, ground water management etc?

Posted in Information Systems | 3 Comments »

The Unkempt Patch

Posted by Sanskriti on August 7, 2009

More writing for Sakal Young Buzz, in CEE’s EarthCare column …

The Unkempt Patch  
– By Laxmikant Deshpande
 
On a rainy day, I saw a bunch of dirty white oval eggs moving by themselves in the mud. I rubbed my eyes and looked again. They were still moving! Within a few seconds, a tear appeared in one and …
more

Read ‘The Unkempt Patch’ by Laxmikant Deshpande, CEE Central on http://www.kidsrgreen.org/sakal/index.htm  Also view a Slideshow on Birds in the Monsoon. Enjoy! 

Give us feedback on earthcare.cee@gmail.com

Posted in CEE's Earthcare Page in Sakal Young Buzz | Leave a Comment »

Local Exchange and Trading Systems

Posted by Sanskriti on August 7, 2009

Local Exchange and Trading Systems (LETS) are community-owned systems of localized transactions not dependent on the formal government backed currency/ money system. LETS are emerging as a means of stimulating or strengthening local economies and communities, for goods and services that people can easily produce and trade locally.

At first, local economies were barter-based, and in indigenous societies, embedded in culture. Different cultures at different times moved from barter to money-based transactions. The situation in the capitalism-oriented world today is that a lot of money, control of trade and governance are concentrated in the hands of relatively few people. Individuals or communities that have a lack or shortage of money may find themselves unable to trade upon their time, skills and other resources through the formal monetized economic transactions.

The difference between traditional barter and LETS is that exchanges are not limited to the two people involved in the exchange; instead an account is maintained of credits and debits. ‘Time banks’ are another localized economic system similar in their objective to LETS, but with goods and services equated to hours of work.

The origin of LETS understood in the ‘modern’ sense, appears to have been in Comox Valley, British Columbia. This town of about 50000 inhabitants was left without major employment when the local timber mill closed down in the 1980s due to recession, and the other employer, an airbase, was transferred. A LETS was initiated, which in 7 years, had an annual turn over of 500000 ‘green dollars’, and a membership of 600. The ability to trade upon labour provided by LETS helped the people pull themselves out of the economic shock caused by the departure of the major employers.

In Argentina, following strictures placed by the IMF in the late 1990s and early 2000s, a range of alternatives to the mainstream money economy arose: barter systems, LETS where labour was exchanged, community currencies as well as alternative currencies, which were backed by the provincial governments. These provided liquidity in a depressed economy and allowed people to access food, healthcare and other essentials which may have been difficult due to the depression of the national currency.

These two examples show that LETS can provide stability to a local economy. Since every transaction credits one party and debits equally another party, there is no need to predict the amount of ‘money’ needed in an economy, which is the case in conventional government-backed currencies. Unlike in the conventional economy, in LETS, money does not create more money by interest or usury. It is work, labour, time, skill and enterprise that create the economy. LETS values enterprise and encourages people to trade on their own skills and time.

DeMeulenaere (2000) describes the experience in Argentina, Community exchange networks, parallel/local/alternative currency systems, or whatever name they choose to go by, are a way of identifying and mobilizing the community’s assets. Rather than focusing on what a community is lacking, they identify what the community is possessing, and build on that foundation.

For many LETS participants, its main advantages appear to be the forging and strengthening of social networks. This is true of similar localized economy networks as well. As one of the members of Cornell’s Ithaca HOURS says on their website,

“Mary earned about 35 HOURS selling organic produce at the Farmer’s Market. She bought roofing and computer programming. She’d like us to develop toward a non-monetary society like that described in Sonia Johnson’s book Wildfire. “Money is a tool of patriarchy that dissociates us from one another and so contributes to the spiritual void.” She says HOURS are “a starting point. They are better than federal currency by being local, and therefore seem safe.”

Indeed, Madison Hours states that their primary mission is ‘to promote economic equity’; and that ‘cooperative philosophy and values are integral to the functioning of their enterprise’. For individuals excluded from the formal economy for various reasons, this conscious effort to build on local abilities maybe a very important contributor to economic and social well-being.

As a method of promoting sustainability, LETS would be expected to contribute to reducing the ‘ecological footprint’ of a community by supplying local goods and services. Some LETS have transactions on local food, local compost, trade in second-hand goods etc. But its not clear whether LETS have substantially enhanced local primary produce and manufacture and replaced imports. Consciously integrating LETS with local recycling and composting programmes may provide a way for enhancing this.

Some LETS appear to have been formed by individuals or groups with ‘green’ leanings. Possibly, these LETS have a greater trade in local produce, driven by local choice for such produce.

For communities interested in assessing their own direction of development, an objective look at membership profiles, types of transactions may help in determining the impact of their LETS. The volume and types of transactions in LETS may be used as an important and easily understandable indicator of sustainability of the region. Tools such as ‘Plugging the Leaks’ developed by The New Economics Foundation can help a community identify the economic resources in their local economy and determine ways to use them more effectively.

Some Constraints

Depending on how a LETS has been formed and members recruited, LETS may be inclusive or become exclusive. If members tend to adhere to a particular ideology, or if the LETS has built upon an existing strong social network, it may actually alienate other communities and individuals, negating one of the main benefits of the LETS concept.

Another issue is the ‘employability’ of individuals, or the marketability of their time, skills and services. Those whose skills are already marketable would tend to reserve these for the formal economy. Others, who can’t market these even in the informal and localized LETS would just run up a long list of ‘debits’. Different LETS have different ways of handling such situations, but too many debits would usually mean that the debtor would have to leave the system.

Many countries recognize LETS and community currencies as legal, and transactions are taxable. However in Thailand, a community currency scheme was stopped by the government within a month as it was perceived as a threat to the government backed currency.

Various researchers (Ingleby 1998 and Rowe and Robins, 2000) have reflected on possible mechanization of social/ community processes in LETS, especially when institutionalized. While LETS provides a framework for community development, just like mainstream economic systems, the decision-making in LETS remains centred on exchange activity. Member participation tends to be measured in terms of trading levels. The basic human values that underlay a cohesive community cannot be supplied by a LETS. Insofar as LETS provides a forum for enhanced local interaction and a feeling of dependence, such values may be strengthened.

Though some LETS have faced issues of structure, actual value to community processes and government acceptance, LETS are seen as important for sustainable development as they have the potential to:

  • strengthen local participation and sense of community
  • value goods and services produced by people who wouldn’t otherwise find place in a formal market economy thereby increasing their quality of life and real income
  • reduce the environmental impact of movement of goods (and perhaps even ‘globalized’ services with huge management overheads) delivered across large / global-scale distances

Anyone know of examples in Pune, or other cities in India?

References

Cato Molly Scott (2006) ‘Argentina in the Red: What can the UK’s Regional Economies Learn from the Argentinian Banking Crisis?’, International Journal of Community Currency Research. Vol 10, pp 43-55

DeMeulenaere Stephen (2000) ‘Reinventing the Market: Alternative Currencies and Community Development in Argentina’, International Journal of Community Currency Research, Volume 4

Hepworth Sarah ‘Local Exchange Trading Systems and Impact Assessment – Application Guidance Notes’ on http://www.enterprise-impact.org.uk/ . Accessed on 15 May 2007

Ingleby Julie (1998) ‘Local Economic Trading Systems: Potentials for New Communities of Meaning: a brief exploration of eight LETSystems, with a focus on decision making’ International Journal of Community Currency Research Vol 2

Gran Even (1998) ‘Green Domination in Norwegian Letsystems: Catalyst For Growth Or Constraint On Development?’ International Journal of Community Currency Research. Vol 2

Pacione M (1997) ‘Local Exchange Trading Systems as a response to the globalization of capitalism’, Urban Studies, 34,8, pp.1179-1199

Rowe J and Robbins C (2000) ‘Leading from below: the contribution of community-based initiatives’ in Barton H (ed) Sustainable Communities: the potential for eco-neighbourhoods, Earthscan, London.

Williams C C (1997) ‘Local Exchange and Trading Systems (LETS) In Australia: A New Tool For Community Development?’ International Journal of Community Currency Research Vol 1

http://www.transaction.net/money/lets/ Accessed on 15 May 2007

http://www.ithacahours.com/ Accessed on 15 May 2007

http://www.madisonhours.org/ Accessed on 15 May 2007

http://www.pluggingtheleaks.org Accessed on 15 May 2007

http://www.worldproutassembly.org/archives/2005/04/why_the_local_m.html Accessed on 15 May 2007

Posted in Community | 14 Comments »

Sustainability, Participation and Education

Posted by Sanskriti on August 6, 2009

Introduction

Participation is one of the key principles of development of sustainability strategies. Dalal-Clayton and Bass[i] state that:

… people and institutions alike do not change because someone else tells them to – they have to be involved in the understanding and realizing the need for change, making decisions about change, and then going through the process themselves. 

Sustainability strategy development requires that different actors – government, private sector, civil society, research institutions etc – jointly consider issues and problems, seek out courses of action, review plans and implementation, in a cyclical manner. Additionally, since strategies have not usually been developed in this manner in the past, the traditional roles of the actors may need to be balanced out to provide space / voice for those hitherto not included.

So, participation processes should be such that help people participate effectively. Techniques may be required so that participants get adequate and accurate information about issues, have time and space to understand intricacies, are able to consider options and engage in fair negotiations when needed. The success of techniques to elicit effective participation can be an important factor in development of good strategies.

Five examples of participatory techniques, obtained from literature and web review are explored here, in this essay written several months ago. They may offer useful insights for CEE’s work in evolving participatory techniques in Pune.

Participatory Technique Design and Use

The following examples provide a small range of different techniques and applications:

  • Deliberative Polling in China, as an example of strategizing at the city level
  • Andhra Pradesh Urban Services to the Poor, as an example of laying the base for institutionalizing participatory strategy development
  • Leicester’s Local Agenda 21, that highlights the dilemma posed by choices that are made through participatory processes but are not environmentally sound and the need for long-term engagement
  • Prajateerpu, Andhra Pradesh, India as an example of facilitating the articulation of issues by marginalized groups themselves at the level of national and international policy
  • NBSAP India as an example of a participatory process of developing a national level strategy which ultimately became limited by not being inclusive of those who have ‘power’

Deliberative Polling

Deliberative Polling is a technique developed by Prof James Fishkin at University of Texas, Austin and currently at Stanford University, US[ii]. A random, representative sample is first polled on the issues to be discussed. After the baseline poll, members of the sample are invited to a briefing/ series of briefings in order to discuss the issues. Briefing materials and carefully balanced and are also made publicly available. The participants engage in dialogue with experts with the various view points and political leaders based on questions they develop in small group discussions with trained moderators. After deliberations, the sample is again asked the original questions. The resulting changes in opinion represent the conclusions the public would reach, if people had opportunity to become more informed and more engaged by the issues.  

This technique appears to have been used in several applications in developing public policy where trade-offs need to be understood and considered. As an example, the technique was used in Zeguo Township, Zhejiang Province, China in 2005[iii]. The Deliberative Poll brought together a representative sample to consider the choice of infrastructure projects affecting the future of the town including particular roads, parks and sewage treatment plants. From the results it appears that an ‘environmental’ project – development of sewage treatment plants – ranked higher, and development of prestige projects like certain roads and parks ranked lower in importance, after the poll.

Deliberative Polling appears to be useful when it is not possible to engage in a poll with the entire population when strategizing. However, good publicity and making available all briefing and discussion materials may be a very important component in providing to some extent, the elements of enhanced education / awareness that are desirable for – indeed an integral part of – sustainability strategies.

Andhra Pradesh Urban Services to the Poor

This second example is based on a paper by Dove (2004), describing findings from a participatory introspection of the Andhra Pradesh Urban Services to the Poor[iv]. This was a partnership between DFID and the government of Andhra Pradesh. This project evolved out of an analysis of DFID funded projects in the 1980s and 90s which revealed that the earlier projects had not had significant long term benefits as expected. Based on this, one of the components in the APUSP was provision of resources to strengthen civil society and enhance the range and quality of services and initiatives for the poor[v].

The participatory techniques used for deciding the nature and location of infrastructure provisioning included SWOT analysis of settlements, mapping and micro-planning, and poverty matrices. These techniques appear to have provided substantial transparency and logical reasoning to the infrastructure projects chosen for implementation.

Participants had a few suggestions to improve the processes: better and formal communications between the municipality and the citizens to enable ownership of processes; increasing the number of civil society representatives; and creating a pool of representatives for each locality so that the responsibility of attending meetings (and therefore time spent) is shared.

The application of participatory techniques in this instance was to provide a transparent way to arrive at locations chosen for implementation based on an analysis of status of infrastructure and poverty.

The techniques were not used for strategizing over the long-term. However, the use of these techniques may have laid the ground for developing abilities to strategize among the various local stakeholders and actors. Given the absence of any discussion with citizens in the earlier processes of budgeting infrastructure projects, this appears to have been a good way to start discussions on certain aspects of sustainability.

Leicester’s Local Agenda 21

In Leicester, UK participatory processes were used for evolving Local Agenda 21 action plans[vi]. Over a period of two years, a range of techniques were used including questionnaires, surveys, focus group discussions and efforts to involve under-represented groups.

A dilemma is highlighted by Roberts (2000)

To create dialogue between individuals, be they residents of a local housing estate or members of the business community or officers in local government, a facilitator is required. This role involves impartiality, ensuring that everyone’s voice is heard and that the principles of dialogue are adhered to; the facilitator cannot be simultaneously the champion of sustainable development. The moment the facilitator disagrees with a view or attempts to push an issue, he or she loses the role.

What is to be done when public participation yields a demand for choices that are clearly unsustainable? As Roberts (2000) asks, ‘Whilst participatory local democracy is the most sustainable form of government, there are questions as to whether it can, in these days of mass media and short-term political horizons, make difficult decisions for the sake of those in distant places and for future generations.’

While a range of participatory tools and processes are used in the development and implementation of the Local Agenda 21, the individual steps have to be woven together to make the whole effective. Roberts (2000) suggests a framework of action consisting of four components: focus on issues and aspirations; develop the capability and habit of responding to local needs; win hearts and minds and develop new and visible projects.

Innovations are needed in cyclical processes of gathering views, collating, providing information on the projections of impacts of choices, while retaining interest in participation.

Prajateerpu

Prajateerpu, which translates to ‘people’s verdict’, was a combination of citizens’ jury, scenario building and public hearing. It took place over six days in 2001. The objective was to facilitate the shaping of a vision for farming and food policy by people most affected by the ‘Vision 2020’ in Andhra Pradesh (AP, India). The aim of Prajateerpu was to identify the key areas of importance to the poor and marginalized groups. Members of the jury included women, landless poor, lower castes, and marginal farmers. Rather than being selected randomly from various groups, they were hand picked with the view that they are often over-looked or drowned in the usual government-led visioning or strategizing processes[vii].

The details of the scenarios are not being described here. The important innovation was the launch of the Prajateerpu report in a very visible way at the House of Commons, UK, the aim of which act was to link local voices on the future of food, farming, and rural development with national and international policy making. One request from the jury was that ‘aid from white people’ should reach and actually benefit them. The Prajateerpu organizers paid for one of the members of the citizens’ jury to travel from her village in AP in order to present the jury’s verdict to MPs, the media and others, in London. The attempt was ‘to go beyond the idea of advocating on behalf of the marginalized to the practice of enabling the marginalized to speak for themselves’[viii]

Reference is made to responses from researchers who participated in an e-forum following the publication of the Prajateerpu report. Stirling points to the importance of the use of selected jurors such as in Prajateerpu, when the objective is ‘opening up’ up of policy debate rather than ‘closing down’ or achieving consensus. Gaventa suggests that though important, concerns of scienticism, rigour or validity are ultimately less significant than the concern about whether or not such deliberative processes serve to provide voice and participation in development strategies.

One observation (perhaps by Robert Chambers) draws attention to the need for calling for an articulation and examination of differing values:

For a scenario exercise to be valid and useful the alternative scenarios should be equally appealing to participants, for example, in terms of the impact they would have on their lives. This is the way in which values and aspirations can be brought out into the light and made explicit, but without introducing biases that could invalidate the exercise.[ix]

The response from DFID on Prajateerpu was:

In parallel, more opportunities need to be created for poor people to earn income, and, as Vision 2020 notes, these are likely to be in services and manufacturing, leading to a reduction in the proportion of people gaining their livelihood primarily from agriculture. DFID does not find any references in Vision 2020 that suggest that this shift in employment will be coerced, as implied by some[x]

An articulation and examination of values and systems of beliefs that underlie different solutions or pathways of development are ultimately needed when choices have to be made.

Thus, two learnings from Prajateerpu are particularly pertinent: one, that participatory processes can be designed to articulate viewpoints that may not be otherwise heard, or heard at the level at which policy formulation happens, and that this type of objective is not necessarily unfair; and two, that an examination of values may also need to be done publicly and that negotiations may be between differing value systems.

The innovation by the organizers of Prajateerpu of connecting those involved in international policy formulation to those who are affected by the policies was an important contribution to the practice of participatory process.

Innovations that can help integrate these concerns in participatory processes, and make the trade-offs and choices more transparent would certainly be a step forward in making sustainability strategies be more informed and inclusive.

NBSAP India

India set out to develop its National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP), as required of all signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity. In a major departure from the usual method producing strategy documents, the Government of India commissioned the NGO Kalpavriksh to lead the process of preparation of India’s NBSAP. A range of participatory planning tools were used – workshops, village level meetings, as well as a biodiversity yatra, exhibitions, radio outreach etc. The process of putting the plan together was as important as the final product. A stated objective of the process was to increase awareness of biodiversity, empower people through participation, and inspire local initiatives to begin implementation of local plans. In this it was very successful – tens of thousands of people were involved in the three-year process. Finally, more than 70 state, sub-state, eco-regional and thematic plans were prepared, in addition to one national plan.

However, when the final draft NBSAP was submitted, the Ministry of Environment and Forests declined to approve and release the national plan.

The NBSAP India process was very successful in its stated objectives of enhancing awareness and encouraging local action. However, it did not have enough dialogue with the more powerful groups including the industry, landowners, politicians and trade unions. An important lesson from the Indian NBSAP experience is that it is essential to strike a balance between ideology and political reality. The voices of the marginalized must be heard, but the ones who have to listen also have to be part of the discussion process[xi].

Conclusions

Participatory processes seem to be successful in enhancing awareness levels, a sense of citizenship, and when thus designed, in articulating the voices of the disadvantaged, all of which are important in the evolution of sustainability strategies. Innovations are yet needed that help in examination of values and clear articulation of trade-offs between different solutions. Over the long-term, such praxis can help in strategies become more informed and inclusive. Participatory techniques are not easy, are time-consuming, and may yield results over the long-term for development of sustainability strategy. ‘Community development’ type of work is more easily done and visible, and may lay the ground for participation in strategizing kind of processes.

Ultimately, the framework of democracy under which participatory processes operate is important because there has to be a clear linkage between decisions made through participatory processes, the acceptance of these decisions, and finally, the ability to hold to account those responsible for implementing the decisions made thus.


References

[i] Dalal-Clayton, B. and Bass, S. (2002) Sustainable Development Strategies: A Resource Book. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)

[ii] http://cdd.stanford.edu/polls/docs/summary/ accessed June 2007

[iii] Jakes, Susan (2005) Dabbling in Democracy, Time April 16, 2005, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1050191,00.html accessed June 2007

[iv] Dove, Lesley (2004) Providing environmental urban services to the poor in Andhra Pradesh: developing strategic decision-making, Environment and Urbanization 2004; 16; 95

[v] Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development (DMAUD) and DFID (2000), “Andhra Pradesh urban services for the poor: project document”, unpublished, quoted in Dove (2004)

[vi]  Roberts, Ian (2000) Leicester environment city: learning how to make Local Agenda 21, partnerships and participation deliver, Environment and Urbanization 2000; 12; 9

[vii] Pimbert, Michel and Tom Wakeford (2003) An introduction to Prajateerpu: a citizens’ jury/scenario workshop on food and farming futures in Andhra Pradesh, India, PLA Notes, February 2003. IIED.

[viii] Ibid

[ix] Contributions on issues of evidence, legitimacy, and authenticity, PLA Notes, February 2003. IIED

[x] Reflections on the e-forum and Prajateerpu report by the UK Department for International Development, India. , PLA Notes, February 2003. IIED

[xi] Apte, T (2006) A People’s Plan for Biodiversity Conservation: Creative Strategies That Work (and Some That Don’t). Gatekeeper Series No 130, IIED, London quoted in Participation, Planning, Politics and Power: Lessons Learned from the Development of a National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan for India. BioSoc: the Biodiversity and Society Bulletin. PCLG, IIED Issue 14: April 2007. Available at http://www.iied.org/pubs/display.php?o=/14538IIED

Posted in Community | Leave a Comment »

Indradhanushya

Posted by Sanskriti on August 2, 2009

World Environment Day 2009 at Indradhanushya

Indradhanushya Centre for Citizenship and Environment Education is a facility developed by Centre for Environment Education for the Pune Municipal Corporation. Its objective is to promote action towards sustainable development in Pune, by schools, citizens and the local government. This collaboration emerged out of a proposal initiated by Smt Vandana Chavan during her tenure as corporator of the area. The vision was for a place where people interested in environment-related activities in the city could come together.

Outdoor Rock Climb features creatures from the Sahyadris

Outdoor Rock Climb features creatures from the Sahyadris

The educational material developed by CEE at Indradhanushya include permanent exhibits and panels. Themes include the history of Pune, local self government, biodiversity, waste and consumption, water, traffic, energy and climate change. Outdoor signage/ wayside exhibits provide information about the beautiful trees in the campus. Architect Shobha Bhopatkar ensured that her building design was such that no trees were cut. The outdoor play equipment includes a ‘rock face’ and a merry go round which has a tiger chasing deer.

The educational material and exhibits were developed by CEE over the last several months through discussions with the municipal departmental heads, NGOs and citizens groups, and academic institutes. The concept of a ‘citizenship and environment education activity centre’ itself evolved out of the process of discussions with various partners.

The building and the exhibits only provide a setting. It is the type of activities and programmes that will determine the extent to which the primary objective of ‘transformational learning for sustainability’ is fulfilled.

Visioning for ID

Visioning for ID

Towards this, a ‘visioning for Indradhanushya’ workshop was arranged in February 2009.

Representatives of Pune’s NGOs, some school teachers, volunteers and anand margis (for which word I thank Jagdish Godbole) together thought about what this place could do and be. Ideas included:

  • Involve children and citizens in monitoring Environmental Quality in Pune
  • Conduct activities on campus with a view to facilitating citizens action, studies and sharing off-campus, and online 
  • Policy interpretation, assessment and policy discussion including of the Environment Status Report, the annual municipal plan and budget, and policies on waste, traffic, water etc
  • Repository for ideas and projects
Ideas for working with schools

Ideas for working with schools, dissemination of information about environment and development issues of Pune, policy discussions ...

 

Gather and share information on Pune's environment and development issues

The institutional arrangements for the admnistration and conduct of activities at Indradhanushya are currently being worked out, and hopefully it will be open to citizens very soon.  

In Indradhanushya, CEE sees a major opportunity in furthering the discipline of Environment Education, and Learning for Sustainability. It could be an urban interpretation centre, a catalyst for citizen action, a place for interested citizens to enhance their effectiveness as learning leaders. The agency that runs Indradhanushya should have a capacity for being self-critical and reflective while developing and implementing the activities and on-going programmes.

Some inspiring examples of museums, activity centres and urban interpretation:

 Muktangan Vigyan Shodhika, IUCAA, Pune (link opens to 12 min video, new window)

Vikram A Sarabhai Community Science Centre, Ahmedabad 

The Biosphere, Montreal has a great floor game on sustainable urban transportation

The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew have wonderful guides who undergo a detailed orientation programme on visitor interaction

And I love the London Walks where too the walk guides are experts in their field

Inns of Court, led by Mr Donald Rumbelow who is the leading light of the Jack the Ripper Walk, but this day led the legal walk

Inns of Court, led by Mr Donald Rumbelow who is the leading light of the Jack the Ripper Walk, but this day led the legal walk

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »